Retirement Planning for Finance Executives: Unwinding What You’ve Built

If you had to summarize the ultimate goal of career professionals in one word, it’s accumulate. 

Maximize compensation. Save and invest, and let compounding go to work. That framework rewards discipline and patience, which many finance executives possess.

Retirement, on the other hand, introduces a new modus operandi: decumulate. The transition from building wealth to living off of it is not easy. The mechanics alone are formidable. Withdrawal sequencing, tax bracket management, RMD planning, Social Security timing, and the unwinding of a compensation package that took decades to build — all happening simultaneously. 

Below, we’ll walk through retirement planning for finance executives, from managing the transition to tax efficiency, income construction, healthcare, and estate strategy. If you’re within five to ten years of stepping back, most of what follows is directly relevant. If you’re earlier, it will show you what to start building now, while you still have the advantage of time and flexibility.

What Makes Retirement Planning Different for Finance Executives

It’s like the difference between an amateur and grandmaster in chess.

Both players use the same board, the same pieces, and the same rules. But the amateur plays the position directly in front of them. The grandmaster plays the game several moves ahead, thinking in sequences and consequences that the amateur hasn’t yet considered. It’s a far more complicated version of the same game. 

Retirement planning for finance executives works the same way. The basic elements are familiar: investment accounts, tax considerations, income needs, estate goals. But the number of variables and the ways they interact are harder to plan around.

Tax management, which once meant deferring as much as possible, now calls for optimizing what you distribute, when, and from which accounts. Compensation that once arrived in layers now has to be unwound in layers, too. Income that once came automatically has to be engineered. Estate planning that probably felt like a future obligation has become a present one.

And perhaps most importantly, the mindset shift from accumulation to decumulation tends to be the hardest adjustment for analytically driven professionals. Accumulation is optimizable. Decumulation is probabilistic, hinging on a strategy resilient enough to sustain your lifestyle across a wide range of outcomes over a multi-decade horizon.

Signs You’re Ready for a More Sophisticated Retirement Strategy

People like to think in round numbers and milestones. Except there’s no single asset threshold that signals your retirement plan needs a more sophisticated approach. The indicators tend to be structural and behavioral.

Financial signals:

• Multiple account types with different tax treatments (taxable brokerage, traditional 401(k), Roth IRA, deferred compensation plans) and no coordinated drawdown strategy
• Concentrated positions in company stock or equity awards that represent a disproportionate share of net worth
• An estate approaching or above the federal exemption ($15 million per individual, as of 2026)
• An RMD horizon of ten years or less, with no Roth conversion strategy in place
• Deferred compensation elections that were made years ago without modeling their effect on future income sources

Behavioral signals:

• Advisor conversations that feel generic or investment-dominated
• A financial plan that hasn’t been stress-tested against realistic scenarios: market downturns, early retirement, a lower-than-expected deferred comp payout
• Tax filing that produces an uncomfortable surprise in April, suggesting that planning and execution aren’t communicating with each other
• A vague sense that the plan is probably fine without a specific framework to verify that it is

There’s a difference between having wealth and having a strategy designed around it. For finance executives, that divide tends to be wider than it should be, as the demands of a career leave limited bandwidth for its own financial architecture.

The Executive Compensation Challenge

Executive compensation is accumulated in layers — base salary, bonuses, deferred plans, equity awards, options. Each is governed by its own vesting schedule, tax implications, and payout timeline. That layered structure has been a primary driver of your wealth. Unlayering it in retirement is a challenge, and one that shapes almost every ensuing planning decision. 

Deferred Compensation Plans

Non-qualified deferred compensation (NQDC) plans allow executives to defer salary and bonuses to a future date, reducing current taxable income and allowing assets to grow pre-tax. However, two risks tend to be underestimated.

Distribution timing. Typically, elections are made years in advance, and the schedule (lump sum or installments, and when) is difficult to change once set. A distribution landing in a year with elevated income can push you into the top bracket. It’s worth modeling deferred comp distributions against Social Security, RMDs, and investment withdrawals over a full retirement before elections are locked in.

Employer credit risk. NQDC plans are unsecured obligations of the employer. In a corporate bankruptcy or restructuring, deferred compensation balances sit behind secured creditors. It’s a risk that’s easy to overlook in a stable organization but quite consequential if it surfaces.

Stock Options: NQ vs. ISO

Non-qualified stock options (NQSOs) generate ordinary income at exercise — taxed at federal rates that can reach 37%, plus applicable state taxes. Incentive stock options (ISOs) receive more favorable capital gains treatment under certain holding conditions but introduce alternative minimum tax exposure that can throw a wrench in your tax picture. 

Exercise timing is particularly important as you approach retirement. Many stock option plans require vested options to be exercised within a relatively short period after leaving the company, often 90 days, although some plans provide longer windows. That can force executives to make large exercise decisions at the same time they’re evaluating retirement, severance, deferred compensation, and other income sources. Understanding your plan’s post-employment exercise rules well before retirement can create opportunities to spread exercises over multiple years or coordinate them with your broader tax strategy. 

	NQSOs	ISOs
Tax at exercise	Ordinary income (up to 37%) + state taxes	No regular tax if holding requirements met
Tax at sale	Capital gains on post-exercise appreciation	Long-term capital gains if holding requirements met
AMT exposure	None	Yes, spread at exercise is an AMT preference item
Holding requirement	None	2+ years from grant, 1+ year from exercise for favorable tax treatment

As of 2026

 

The interplay between option exercise, income brackets, and IRMAA calculations in the years approaching and entering Medicare eligibility can shift the after-tax outcome by a substantial amount. 

State tax sourcing adds another layer of complexity. Deferred compensation and stock options are subject to different sourcing rules, so if you’ve lived or worked in multiple states, the state where income is taxed may not be the state where you currently reside. Getting this wrong can be costly. 

RSUs and Concentrated Company Stock

RSUs are treated as ordinary income in the year of vesting, adding to taxable compensation regardless of whether shares are sold. If you have large unvested grants in the final years of employment, the vesting schedule directly affects retirement timing and bracket management decisions. 

Event	Tax Treatment	Planning Consideration
Vesting	Ordinary income (up to 37%) on fair market value at vest	Affects your tax bracket in the vesting year regardless of whether you sell
Sale (held under one year post-vesting)	Short-term capital gains (ordinary income rates)	If RSU vesting pushes company stock above 10% of your total portfolio, you may want to consider a partial sale. Since the cost basis is set at fair market value on the vesting date, short-term gains on an immediate sale are minimal — the real exposure is holding a concentrated position longer than necessary.
Sale (held over one year post-vesting)	Long-term capital gains (0%, 15%, or 20% depending on income)	Long-term capital gains treatment is preferred, but the holding period comes with continued single-stock exposure. The tax benefit should be weighed against the market risk you’re carrying in the interim.

As of 2026

 

The larger issue is concentration. Chances are you’ll retire with a material share of your net worth tied to a single company — the same employer that provided your salary, deferred comp, and perhaps even a pension. 

Research on individual stock performance found that 40% of Russell 3000 stocks since 1980 suffered catastrophic losses — defined as a 70%+ decline with minimal recovery.¹ Two-thirds of all stocks underperformed the index over that same period. The company you dedicated your career to could be the exception. But “could be” isn’t a reliable retirement strategy.

Employer Stock in Your 401(k): Don’t Overlook NUA

If your 401(k) holds appreciated company stock, there is a tax strategy to understand before you roll assets into an IRA: Net Unrealized Appreciation, or NUA. 

In certain circumstances, you can distribute company stock from your 401(k) in-kind, pay ordinary income tax only on your original cost basis, and then pay the lower long-term capital gains rate on the appreciation once the stock is eventually sold. 

If you have highly appreciated employer stock inside your 401(k), the difference between an NUA strategy and a standard IRA rollover can be substantial. It’s also easy to miss, because the window to execute it is narrow and the decision is largely irreversible. It’s another reason why the transition out of a company plan deserves careful analysis before any assets move.

Lump Sum vs. Installments

For deferred comp and certain pension distributions, the lump sum versus installment decision should be analyzed carefully. Installments spread tax liability over multiple years, which can reduce bracket exposure and IRMAA surcharges over time. A lump sum captures assets immediately but concentrates the tax event. Which is better depends on your overarching income picture.

Managing Taxes Over Multiple Decades

Research consistently finds that tax drag is among the largest reducers of long-term portfolio performance, often exceeding the impact of investment fees and other costs.² If you have substantial balances across multiple account types, the difference between a reactive approach to tax management and a coordinated one can translate to hundreds of thousands of dollars over your retirement. 

Dynamic Withdrawal Management

The conventional withdrawal sequence is to draw taxable accounts first, then tax-deferred, and then tax-free. It’s a reasonable starting point for many retirees. That said, you likely have a relatively complex mix of accounts. 

The more effective approach is dynamic, bracket-aware withdrawal management: drawing from different account types each year based on income levels, Roth conversion opportunities, RMD timelines, and capital gains exposure. In turn, this helps smooth taxable income across years instead of following a fixed sequence that may spike brackets unnecessarily in some years and leave low brackets unused in others.

A practical illustration: in a year when deferred comp distributions are lower, it may make sense to pull additional income from a traditional IRA to fill a lower bracket — paying modest tax now rather than allowing that balance to compound into larger RMDs taxed at higher rates later. In a year of elevated income, the opposite logic applies. 

Roth Conversions

The window between retirement and the onset of RMDs is a valuable tax planning opportunity.

During this period, income typically drops from its career peak and mandatory distributions haven’t yet begun. By converting traditional IRA or 401(k) balances to Roth during these lower-income years (paying taxes now at potentially favorable rates), you can reduce future RMDs and increase tax-free income later.

The window is finite. RMDs begin at 73 under current law, rising to 75 in 2033. Executives who retire in their late 50s or early 60s may have a decade-plus of Roth conversion runway. 

Required Minimum Distributions

It’s quite common for corporate executives, who spend decades deferring income into traditional retirement accounts, to reach RMD age with sizable balances. Consequently, mandatory annual distributions push them into the top federal bracket regardless of actual spending needs. Those distributions stack onto Social Security income, deferred comp installments, and investment income — triggering tax events that weren’t planned for and aren’t driven by lifestyle needs.

Managing this starts long before RMDs begin, namely through Roth conversions, strategic early withdrawals, and deferred comp distribution elections that smooth the income curve. 

Capital Gains and Bracket Management

Long-term capital gains rates are favorable relative to ordinary income rates, and their application is sensitive to income level. 

Timing asset sales and other gain-realizing events in years when ordinary income is lower shifts more gains into the 15% or 0% bracket rather than the 20% bracket (plus the 3.8% net investment income tax that applies at higher income levels). 

Consider a hypothetical couple with $500,000 in long-term capital gains. In a year of moderate ordinary income, they’d likely be in the 15% bracket, so realizing those gains would trigger a tax bill of $75,000. In a year of elevated ordinary income, perhaps from a deferred comp distribution, the same $500,000 in gains faces a 20% rate plus the 3.8% net investment income tax, for a combined $119,000 — a $44,000 difference. 

If you’re managing concentrated positions or large taxable portfolios, this coordination can translate into substantial after-tax savings across retirement. 

Building a Retirement Income Strategy

While working, your compensation is a metronome: predictable and steady. In retirement, you’re charged with replicating a “salary” from various disparate sources, each of which has vastly different tax treatments and timing constraints. 

Social Security: The Case for Waiting

Depending on your lifestyle, Social Security probably won’t cover your retirement spending. But it does serve as a dependable, inflation-adjusted income floor that grows predictably over time and is resistant to the market variables that affect everything else in your portfolio. 

Delaying from full retirement age to 70 earns 8% per year in delayed retirement credits. In 2026, the maximum benefit at 70 is $5,181 per month, compared to $2,969 at 62 — a difference of over $26,000 in annual income. If you have sufficient assets to bridge the gap and don’t have any health complications, delaying is generally prudent. That’s particularly true for the higher earner in a married couple, as the delayed benefit also increases the survivor benefit.

The complication for executives is income interaction. Deferred comp distributions, Roth conversions, and investment withdrawals in the years before Social Security begins affect bracket positioning and IRMAA calculations. Consequently, Social Security timing is part of a larger sequencing decision rather than a standalone one.

Coordinating Multiple Income Sources

You’ll likely enter retirement drawing from several directions simultaneously:

Income Source	Tax Treatment	Controllability
Taxable investment accounts	Capital gains rates	High, withdrawals are discretionary
Traditional IRAs and 401(k)s	Ordinary income	Moderate, RMDs apply at 73 or 75
Roth IRAs	Tax-free	High, no RMDs
Deferred compensation	Ordinary income	Low, elections are locked in
Social Security	Partially taxable	Moderate, timing is a one-time decision
Real estate and rental income	Various	Variable
Consulting and board income	Ordinary income	High, activity dependent

As of 2026

 

What the table doesn’t show is how these sources affect one another. A large deferred comp distribution in the same year as RMDs and Social Security can raise ordinary income and effective tax rates. A Roth IRA withdrawal in the same year can happen tax-free without affecting any of the other calculations. 

By coordinating these sources, you can devise a drawdown strategy that minimizes lifetime tax liability, sustains adequate liquidity, and avoids forcing your investment portfolio to absorb unnecessary risk.

Sequence of Returns Risk

A 30% market decline is never easy to stomach. But it’s particularly nauseating while you’re actively withdrawing from your portfolio. While working, there was the silver lining of steady contributions offsetting losses and dollar-cost averaging. Early retirement losses, combined with ongoing withdrawals, can permanently impair a portfolio’s ability to recover — even if subsequent returns are strong.

This risk is managed through structure: maintaining sufficient liquidity in lower-volatility assets to cover several years of withdrawals without selling equities at depressed prices, and building enough flexibility into your spending strategy to reduce discretionary withdrawals in adverse market conditions without disrupting essential needs.

Investment Strategy in Retirement

Think about how a business’s financial priorities evolve from its growth phase to its mature phase. In growth, capital goes toward expansion — maximum reinvestment, tolerance for volatility, and a long time horizon. In maturity, the objective changes to capital preservation, sustainability, and the ability to weather downturns without compromising operations. 

A retirement portfolio makes the same transition. 

If you have a concentrated company stock position, this period is also important for diversification. The same concentration that generated significant wealth during your career can become a structural risk in retirement, when ongoing compensation no longer exists to absorb the downside of a single-stock event.

Cash flow planning answers a specific question that portfolio management alone doesn’t: which dollar comes from where, and when? An executive with $5 million across four account types doesn’t have a simple answer to “how do I fund my lifestyle this year?” without a deliberate framework. The wrong answer can produce outcomes that a better sequencing strategy would have avoided entirely. Built correctly, a cash flow plan functions as the operating system for everything else in the retirement strategy.

Healthcare and Long-Term Care

No one likes to think about medical needs, let alone the associated costs of those services. But they can be the most significant individual expense in retirement, so they’re worth addressing now versus reacting to later. 

The Pre-Medicare Gap

If you retire before 65, you’ll face a gap in coverage that can be expensive, especially if your income remains elevated from deferred comp distributions or investment withdrawals. Options include COBRA (typically costly), ACA marketplace plans (with premiums income-sensitive), and private insurance. 

Medicare and IRMAA

Medicare eligibility begins at 65, but cost is income-dependent. The Income-Related Monthly Adjustment Amount (IRMAA) adds surcharges to Part B and Part D premiums for higher-income beneficiaries, using a two-year income lookback. In 2026:

FIling Status	Income Threshold	Part B Surcharge (IRMAA)	Part B Premium
Single	$109,000 or less	$0	$202.90
Single	$109,001 – $137,000	+$81.20	$284.10
Single	$137,001 – $174,000	+$202.80	$405.70
Single	$174,001 – $205,000	+$324.40	$527.30
Joint	$218,000 or less	$0	$202.90
Joint	$218,001 – $274,000	+$81.20	$284.10
Joint	$274,001 – $348,000	+$202.80	$405.70
Joint	$348,001 – $410,000	+$324.40	$527.30
Joint	$410,001 – $750,000	+$405.60	$608.50
Joint	Above $750,000	+$487.00	$689.90

Source: CMS 2026 Medicare Parts A & B Premiums and Deductibles. Surcharges are per person, per month.

 

The two-year lookback takes many people by surprise. Income in your final working year drives Medicare premiums two years later. An executive retiring in 2026 who had a high-income 2025 will face elevated 2027 premiums regardless of their current income. IRMAA appeals (Form SSA-44) are available for qualifying life changes, including retirement, and are worth filing if income drops significantly.

Health Savings Accounts

If you’re currently enrolled in a high-deductible health plan, the HSA is the most tax-advantaged account available. Contributions are pre-tax, growth is tax-free, and withdrawals for qualified medical expenses are also tax-free — a triple tax advantage unavailable elsewhere. In 2026, contribution limits are $4,400 for individual coverage and $8,750 for family coverage, with a $1,000 catch-up for those 55 and older.

After age 65, the definition of qualified expenses expands to include Medicare premiums. So if you preserve HSA balances instead of spending them down in working years, you effectively create a dedicated, tax-advantaged healthcare fund for retirement.

Long-Term Care

About 7 in 10 adults who reach 65 will develop care needs in their lifetime, with the average person needing about three years of support.³ Roughly 1 in 5 will face $200,000 or more in lifetime long-term care costs. ₄

That presents an all-important question: how should you fund care needs if they arise without disrupting your financial plan? The options include traditional long-term care insurance, hybrid life/LTC policies, and self-insurance through portfolio reserves. Premiums and insurability change as health evolves, which means earlier decisions tend to offer more choices.

Estate Planning and Legacy

Estate planning is consequential yet frequently neglected. The combination of significant assets and demanding schedules often leads to an estate plan that’s either absent, outdated, or disconnected from the retirement income strategy it should be coordinated with.

The Estate Tax Landscape

The federal estate and gift tax exemption is $15 million per individual ($30 million per married couple) in 2026, with annual inflation adjustments going forward. For most executives, that exemption provides plenty of room.

Still, several planning tools remain highly effective if you’re looking to transfer wealth efficiently or reduce future estate tax exposure: 

• Annual gifting: The annual gift tax exclusion allows tax-free transfers of up to $19,000 per recipient in 2026 ($38,000 for married couples), with no impact on the lifetime exemption
• Irrevocable trusts: Remove assets from the taxable estate and shift future appreciation to beneficiaries
• Family limited partnerships / LLCs: Can facilitate wealth transfer at a discount while retaining some control
• Grantor Retained Annuity Trusts (GRATs): Transfer appreciation above a hurdle rate to heirs with minimal gift tax exposure

Charitable Giving

If you have philanthropic goals, several planning strategies allow giving to be both impactful and tax-efficient:

• Donor-Advised Funds (DAFs): Contribute cash or appreciated securities to a DAF and take the full tax deduction in the year of contribution, even if you distribute the funds to charities over many subsequent years. Donating appreciated stock directly, rather than selling it first and donating cash, eliminates capital gains tax on the appreciation. DAFs work well in high-income years if you want to lock in a large deduction now while retaining flexibility over which organizations receive the funds and when.
• Qualified Charitable Distributions (QCDs): Once you reach age 70½, you can direct up to $111,000 annually (2026; indexed for inflation) from a traditional IRA to a qualifying charity as a QCD. The distribution counts toward your RMD but is excluded from AGI — meaning it doesn’t add to taxable income, doesn’t push you into a higher bracket, and won’t increase Social Security taxability or trigger IRMAA surcharges. It effectively converts a taxable event into a tax-free one. It’s generally best for IRA owners who want to satisfy RMD requirements while giving charitably, without the tax cost of a standard distribution.
• Charitable Remainder Trusts (CRTs): Transfer appreciated assets (e.g., concentrated stock) into an irrevocable trust. The trust sells the assets without triggering immediate capital gains, reinvests the proceeds, and pays you an income stream for a defined period or for life. At termination, the remaining assets pass to your designated charity. You receive a partial upfront deduction based on the present value of the charitable remainder. It’s generally best for executives with large concentrated positions who want to generate retirement income, defer capital gains, and fulfill charitable goals simultaneously.

Beneficiary Coordination

Beneficiary designations on retirement accounts and life insurance policies override whatever a will or trust document says. So, an outdated designation that predates a marriage, divorce, or death in the family can redirect assets unintentionally. This cannot be corrected easily after the fact.

If you have multiple account types, multiple entities, and potentially multiple marriages or family arrangements, a periodic beneficiary review is an imperative planning exercise.

What’s Holding You Back?

You’re trained to analyze risk, model scenarios, and make decisions rife with uncertainty. And yet, it’s quite common to reach the cusp of retirement and hesitate. 

It’s understandable. These are consequential, largely irreversible decisions. But the most common objections also tend to be the most addressable.

“I’m earning more than I ever have. Why would I stop now?”

The frank reality is that each additional year of work, for an executive who is already financially secure, produces a marginal increase in retirement spending capacity. Meanwhile, by continuing to work longer than you might want to, you consume years that can’t be reclaimed. 

That said, if the work itself is fulfilling, that’s a legitimate reason to keep going, and no conventional milestone like 62 or 65 obligates you to stop. Ultimately, the decision should be deliberate, with a crystal-clear view of what each additional year actually costs and what it offers in return.

“I’ve spent my career analyzing risk. I should be able to figure this out myself.”

Professional expertise in finance is an asset in retirement planning. The challenge is that the specific complexity executives face — compensation unwinding, multi-account tax sequencing, estate coordination — benefits from external perspective and ongoing execution. Understanding the theory and managing the ongoing decisions are not one and the same. 

There is a reason why even the most skilled surgeons in the world don’t operate on their own families. You might be an expert at finance, but you are also the beneficiary, the decision-maker, and the one living with the consequences. An “outside-in” perspective helps prevent oversights or biased decisions.

“The market feels too uncertain right now. I should wait for better conditions.”

Uncertainty is an inherent feature of markets — you can’t wait it out. 

History is not short on reasons to practice patience, however difficult it may feel at the time: the 1973 oil crisis, double-digit inflation in the late 1970s, Black Monday in 1987, the dot-com collapse, the 2008 financial crisis, a global pandemic. Every generation has inherited a version of the same concern — and in every case, the markets eventually recovered, and the people who waited for certainty before planning simply waited. 

“My compensation structure is complicated. I’m not sure any advisor truly understands it.”

This is a fair concern. But it’s worthwhile to question potential financial advisors instead of avoiding the conversation. An advisor who works with finance executives regularly should be fluent in NQDC distribution elections, NQ versus ISO treatment, and the relationships between equity awards and bracket management. 

“What if I run out of money, or leave too much on the table?”

The answer to both is the same: a plan stress-tested across multiple scenarios (e.g., different market environments, spending levels, longevity assumptions, and healthcare costs) that provides a realistic view of the range of outcomes. 

Why the “CFO” Approach Changes the Equation

In your career, you know that the most significant risks aren’t found in individual transactions, but in the friction between them. Retirement is no different. It isn’t a single event; it is a decade-long sequence of interconnected decisions that must move in lockstep.

You wouldn’t run a corporation with siloed departments that don’t speak to one another. Yet, many retirees manage their financial lives that way.

At Simon Quick, we act as the CFO of your personal balance sheet. That includes:

• A comprehensive review of compensation structure, account types, and estate exposure — held together as an integrated picture 
• Deferred compensation and equity planning that sequences distributions in the context of your retirement income strategy
• Dynamic tax planning coordinated with your accountant, oriented toward lifetime tax minimization rather than year-by-year optimization
• Retirement income construction that coordinates multiple sources into a coherent, sustainable strategy
• Healthcare planning that addresses the pre-Medicare gap, IRMAA exposure, and long-term care before they’re urgent
• Estate planning integration to help wealth transfer intentionally, without the coordination miscues that can emerge if legal and financial planning operate independently

We also quarterback the full advisory team: your accountant, estate attorney, and where warranted, additional specialists — so that every professional involved is working toward the same definition of success.

One Conversation Can Change Your Life

The decisions that define a retirement are made years before it, while the window to sequence compensation, manage tax exposure, and build the right structure is still open.

If you’re ready to bring the same rigor to your retirement that you’ve brought to your career, we’d welcome the conversation.

Schedule a Complimentary Consultation

 

Sources

¹ JP Morgan, The Agony and The Ecstasy: The Risk and Rewards of a Concentrated Stock Position

² Ang, Andrew, Uncle Sam’s Cut: A Century of the Federal Tax Drag on US Equity Returns

³ Jackson National Life Insurance, Security in Retirement Series (2025)

₄ ASPE, Long-Term Services and Supports Reform (2025)

 

Disclaimer

This information is for general and educational purposes only. You should not assume that any discussion or information contained herein serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice from Simon Quick Advisors & Co., LLC (“Simon Quick”) nor should this be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to purchase an interest in a security or separate accounts of any type. Asset Allocation and diversifying asset classes may be used in an effort to manage risk and enhance returns. It does not, however, guarantee a profit or protect against loss. Investing in Liquid and Illiquid Alternative Investments may not be suitable for all investors and involves a high degree of risk. Many Alternative Investments are highly illiquid, meaning that you may not be able to sell your investment when you wish. Risk of Alternative Investments can vary based on the underlying strategies used.

Please remember that past performance may not be indicative of future results. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product (including the investments and/or investment strategies recommended or undertaken by Simon Quick), or any non-investment related content, made reference to directly or indirectly in this newsletter will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated historical performance level(s), be suitable for your portfolio or individual situation, or prove successful. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may no longer be reflective of current opinions or positions. To the extent that a reader has any questions regarding the applicability of any specific issue discussed above to his/her individual situation, he/she is encouraged to consult with the professional advisor of his/her choosing. Simon Quick is neither a law firm nor a certified public accounting firm and no portion of the newsletter content should be construed as legal or accounting advice. If you are a Simon Quick client, please remember to contact Simon Quick, in writing, if there are any changes in your personal/financial situation or investment objectives for the purpose of reviewing/evaluating/revising our previous recommendations and/or services.

Simon Quick Advisors, LLC (Simon Quick) is an SEC registered investment adviser with a principal place of business in Morristown, NJ. Simon Quick may only transact business in states in which it is registered, or qualifies for an exemption or exclusion from registration requirements. A copy of our written disclosure brochure discussing our advisory services and fees is available upon request. References to Simon Quick Advisors as being “registered” does not imply a certain level of education or expertise.

This newsletter and the accompanying discussion include forward-looking statements. All statements that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements, including any statements that relate to future market conditions, results, operations, strategies or other future conditions or developments and any statements regarding objectives, opportunities, positioning or prospects. Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon speculation, expectations, estimates and assumptions that are inherently unreliable and subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies. Forward-looking statements are not a promise or guaranty about future events.

Economic, index, and performance information herein has been obtained from various third party sources. While we believe the source to be accurate and reliable, Simon Quick has not independently verified the accuracy of information. In addition, Simon Quick makes no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy, reliability, or utility of information obtained from third parties.

Historical performance results for investment indices and/or categories have been provided for general comparison purposes only, and generally do not reflect the deduction of transaction and/or custodial charges, the deduction of an investment management fee, nor the impact of taxes, the incurrence of which would have the effect of decreasing historical performance results. It should not be assumed that your account holdings correspond directly to any comparative indices or benchmark index, as comparative indices or benchmark index may be more or less volatile than your account holdings. You cannot invest directly in an index.

Indices included in this report are for purposes of comparing your returns to the returns on a broad-based index of securities most comparable to the types of securities held in your account(s). Although your account(s) invest in securities that are generally similar in type to the related indices, the particular issuers, industry segments, geographic regions, and weighting of investments in your account do not necessarily track the index. The indices assume reinvestment of dividends and do not reflect deduction of any fees or expenses. 

Please note: Indices are frequently updated and the returns on any given day may differ from those presented in this document. Index data and other information contained herein is supplied from various sources and is believed to be accurate but Simon Quick has not independently verified the accuracy of this information.