Two Deals, Same Price: Why Structure Determines What You Actually Walk Away With

We recently examined “Rollover Equity” in a business sale transaction, and dove into the upside, as well as the possible landmines to be careful of. Buyers in the lower middle market often use rollover equity to structure a deal to help de-risk their position, and align seller motivations alongside their own. They can also use some other financial engineering methods, frequently combined with each other, to deliver a more attractive looking headline number. Today let’s examine the anatomy of deal structure:

Two founders sell similar businesses for $20 million each. A year later, one is on sabbatical in Europe. The other is still working 30 hours a week, watching decisions erode the payout he’s counting on. 

Same headline number. Completely different structures.

Business owners spend years fixating on valuation — and for good reason. But purchase price is only one variable in a business sale. How that price is paid, over what timeline, and under what conditions determines what you walk away with and what risks you carry forward after closing. More importantly, it shapes whether the life you imagined on the other side of the transaction actually materializes, making a thoughtful LOI critically important. For a deeper examination on the importance the Letter of Intent ”LOI” plays in protecting you, please read our article on the subject.

Let’s walk through the key components of deal structure that every business owner needs to understand before signing.

Why Transaction Structure Matters More Than Many Business Owners Realize

Purchase price is just one variable. Structure drives everything else: risk, control, taxes, timing, and post-closing obligations.

A $20 million business valuation can appear concrete, and it often becomes the focal point of negotiations. But that number is only the starting point.

Buyers Use Structure to Shift Risk

Once valuation is agreed upon, many business owners assume the hard part is done. 

It’s not.

From a buyer’s perspective, the purchase price reflects what they’re willing to pay under ideal conditions. Structure defines those conditions. Earnouts, seller financing, escrow holdbacks, and rollover equity all allow buyers to manage uncertainty. They support the valuation while shifting a portion of the risk back to the seller.

From the seller’s side, structure also determines your day-to-day after closing, but the risk is not always obvious at signing. Earnouts may require you to stay engaged for several years. Transition agreements can evolve into ongoing operational responsibilities. Equity rollovers can keep a portion of your wealth tied to the future performance of the business.

Many owners we talk with say they have plenty of gas in the tank, and in fact are energized by the growth conversations they have with a potential buying partner. However, if you’re ready to move on, deal terms that mandate ongoing involvement can feel like a trap, regardless of the valuation. 

This is why it’s imperative to spend as much time analyzing deal terms as you do negotiating the headline number.

The Anatomy of Deal Structure: Key Components Business Owners Need to Understand

Most deals are a mix of cash, deferred payments, contingent payments, and equity. 

Understanding each piece is critical before you agree to the whole.

Cash at Closing (Upfront Payment)

Cash at closing is the only true guaranteed component. It’s the portion of the purchase price you receive immediately, without conditions.

Cash at closing often ranges from 55% to 85% of the total purchase price. It can be lower, it can be higher, and the higher the cash percentage, the lower your risk.

If the upfront cash portion drops below that range, the balance is typically made up of elements that introduce uncertainty, and sellers should price that risk accordingly while evaluating the overall offer.

Earnouts (Contingent on Future Performance)

Earnouts tie a portion of the purchase price to the future performance of the business, usually measured by revenue or EBITDA over a defined period. They’re common when parties can’t agree on valuation or when a buyer wants protection against aggressive projections.

The problem for sellers is that once you’ve signed, you no longer control pricing decisions, staffing, sales strategy, or cost structure — but your payout still depends on all of them. 

Misalignment is common. The buyer may prioritize long-term growth or integration, while your earnout is tied to short-term performance targets. Now, a portion of your sale price is dependent on someone else’s decisions. Important to note, it is the #1 most frequently litigated element of M&A transactions in this space.

Seller Financing (Seller Notes)

Seller notes require the seller to finance a portion of the purchase price directly, with the buyer repaying over time, typically three to five years. This arrangement is common in smaller transactions with buyers who can’t secure full third-party financing. 

The risk for sellers: you’re essentially lending money to the buyer with the business as collateral, which creates ongoing credit pressure. You’ve sold the business and exited it operationally, but part of your proceeds is now dependent on the buyer’s ability to operate it successfully. If you are supremely confident in the buyer and their ability to pay, this can represent a relatively high-yielding note back to you.

Keep in mind, seller notes are typically subordinated to senior debt, meaning other lenders are paid first if the business runs into trouble. 

Rollover Equity (Ownership in the New Entity)

Rollover equity allows you to retain ownership in the new entity, typically alongside a private equity buyer. This is usually positioned as an opportunity to participate in future growth,  sometimes referred to as a “second exit” once the PE firm eventually exits.

However, this structure can be complicated because rollover equity is illiquid, meaning you can’t access it until a future sale or liquidity event. You’re also a minority investor in most cases, with limited control over decisions that impact value.

Now, your profit is based entirely on the buyer’s ability to grow and exit the business on a favorable timeline, which could be five to seven years away, or longer. For more on this, read our article on rollover equity. 

Escrow and Holdbacks

In many deals, a portion of the purchase price is held in escrow for a set period, typically 12 to 24 months.

This is designed to protect the buyer against potential issues, such as undisclosed liabilities or breaches of representations and warranties. In most clean transactions, the funds are returned. But that capital is inaccessible in the interim and subject to reduction if issues surface.

Working Capital Adjustments

Most deals include a target level of working capital that the business is expected to deliver at closing. If the actual working capital falls below that target, the seller may need to make a payment to the buyer after the deal closes.

These adjustments are often negotiated upfront, but disputes are common. Differences in how working capital is defined or calculated can lead to post-closing friction and unexpected financial adjustments.

It’s another example of how the final outcome of a deal can shift even after the documents are signed.

Two Deals, Deconstructed

Let’s play out the implications of different deals, where two buyers present different offers at the same valuation.

The business: 

• SaaS company (most commonly valued at a multiple of Annual Recurring Revenue)
• $3 million in ARR 
• Stable growth profile
• Purchase price: $20 million

Important note: The risk assessments and adjusted valuations below are illustrative examples designed to show how structure affects deal outcomes. Actual risk discounts would depend on specific terms, buyer track record, industry conditions, and the seller’s assessment of earnout achievability.

Deal A: Buyer-Friendly Structure (High Risk for Seller)

Structure:

• $8 million cash at closing (40%)
• $6 million earnout over 3 years, tied to revenue growth targets (30%)
• $4 million rollover equity in buyer’s entity (20%)
• $2 million seller note, payable over 4 years (10%)

What This Means for the Seller:

The headline number is $20 million, but only $8 million is guaranteed. The $6 million earnout is tethered to hitting aggressive growth targets in a business the seller no longer controls — and the new owner’s decisions about pricing, headcount, and strategy will directly affect whether those targets are achievable. The $4 million in rollover equity is illiquid and tied to a future exit that may not happen for five to seven years, if at all. The seller note adds another layer of exposure, dependent on the financial health of the business post-sale.

There are also ongoing obligations. To qualify for the earnout, the seller is expected to remain involved (30 hours a week) for at least three years, the duration of the earnout period. 

After accounting for taxes and applying realistic probability discounts to the contingent components, the true economic value of this deal is materially lower than the headline number — likely 30% to 40% less than $20 million.

Deal B: Seller-Friendly Structure (Lower Risk, Clean Exit)

Structure:

• $16 million cash at closing (80%)
• $3 million escrow holdback for 18 months (15%, released if no indemnification claims)
• $1 million seller note, payable over 2 years (5%)

What This Means for the Seller:

The headline number is still $20 million, but $16 million is guaranteed and liquid immediately. The escrow and seller note carry some tail risk, but it’s modest and short-duration. With a basic transition period of 30 to 90 days, the seller can walk away fairly smoothly. 

After taxes, the economic value of this deal is close to the headline number — likely 90% to 95% realized within two years of closing.

Side-by-Side Comparison

Element	Deal A (High Risk)	Deal B (Low Risk)
Cash at Closing	$8M (40%)	$16M (80%)
Guaranteed Money	$8M	$16M
Contingent/At-Risk	$12M (earnout, equity, note)	$4M (escrow, note)
Post-Closing Involvement	3+ years (earnout-driven)	30–90 days (transition)
Liquidity Timeline	5–7 years (for equity)	18–24 months (full payout)

How to Evaluate Competing Offers 

The above two deals are obviously very different, and that’s not always the case. If you receive two comparable offers, the first comparison should always be structural: how much is guaranteed, how much is contingent, and what are you being asked to do (and risk) to earn the rest?

Step 1: Calculate Guaranteed vs. At-Risk Money

Start with a simple question: what is the realistic, risk-adjusted value of each offer? 

For contingent components like earnouts and rollover equity, apply a probability-weighted discount based on what’s realistic. A $6 million earnout that requires 20% revenue growth in a business you’ll no longer control may be worth $3 million in realistic terms.

Step 2: Assess Your Post-Closing Obligations

Be honest about your post-closing priorities and consider how long you’ll remain tied to the business. If you want a clean exit, a structure that keeps you operationally involved for two to three years to chase an earnout has a non-financial cost. That cost belongs in the analysis.

Step 3: Model the Tax Treatment of Each Component

For businesses built over several years, cash at closing from a stock sale typically qualifies for long-term capital gains treatment. Earnouts may be taxed as ordinary income if they’re structured as compensation. Rollover equity defers taxes until a future liquidity event, but that future event is uncertain. 

An M&A advisor can model the after-tax proceeds of each offer side by side, which often changes the ranking considerably.

Step 4: Evaluate the Buyer’s Track Record

For any portion of the deal tied to future performance, the buyer’s competence matters. Their track record, strategy, and approach to integration all influence the likelihood of achieving projected outcomes.

Have they successfully integrated acquisitions before? What’s their reputation for paying out earnouts? If they’re private equity, what’s their exit timeline?

Step 5: Get Your Advisory Team Involved Early

Deals move quickly once they gain momentum. Stop me if you’ve heard this before: bringing in your advisor, attorney, and tax professional early allows you to evaluate structure before terms are locked in. This is where coordinated advice can make a life-changing difference.

Structure Is Strategy. Work With Advisors Who Understand Both

Two business owners can sign deals with the same valuation and walk away with very different outcomes. The difference isn’t luck. It’s structure.

The best exits we’ve seen share a common characteristic: the seller had a coordinated advisory team working alongside them before the LOI was signed, not after. An M&A attorney who flags the working capital language and can protect you from structural risks. A CPA who models the after-tax value of each offer. A financial advisor who stress-tests the deal against your long-term wealth plan and keeps the full picture in view, and an experienced investment banker that holds the buyer’s feet to the fire to bring a market deal structure to the table

At Simon Quick Advisors, we help business owners evaluate not just what a deal says, but what it means, and whether they have the right deal team around them — financially, personally, and for the life they want to build after the sale process. If you’re approaching a transaction or beginning to think about your strategic options, we’d welcome a conversation.

One conversation can change your life. Let’s talk.

 

Disclaimer

This information is for general and educational purposes only. You should not assume that any discussion or information contained herein serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice from Simon Quick Advisors & Co., LLC (“Simon Quick”) nor should this be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to purchase an interest in a security or separate accounts of any type. Asset Allocation and diversifying asset classes may be used in an effort to manage risk and enhance returns. It does not, however, guarantee a profit or protect against loss. Investing in Liquid and Illiquid Alternative Investments may not be suitable for all investors and involves a high degree of risk. Many Alternative Investments are highly illiquid, meaning that you may not be able to sell your investment when you wish. Risk of Alternative Investments can vary based on the underlying strategies used.

Please remember that past performance may not be indicative of future results. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product (including the investments and/or investment strategies recommended or undertaken by Simon Quick), or any non-investment related content, made reference to directly or indirectly in this newsletter will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated historical performance level(s), be suitable for your portfolio or individual situation, or prove successful. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may no longer be reflective of current opinions or positions. To the extent that a reader has any questions regarding the applicability of any specific issue discussed above to his/her individual situation, he/she is encouraged to consult with the professional advisor of his/her choosing. Simon Quick is neither a law firm nor a certified public accounting firm and no portion of the newsletter content should be construed as legal or accounting advice. If you are a Simon Quick client, please remember to contact Simon Quick, in writing, if there are any changes in your personal/financial situation or investment objectives for the purpose of reviewing/evaluating/revising our previous recommendations and/or services.

Simon Quick Advisors, LLC (Simon Quick) is an SEC registered investment adviser with a principal place of business in Morristown, NJ. Simon Quick may only transact business in states in which it is registered, or qualifies for an exemption or exclusion from registration requirements. A copy of our written disclosure brochure discussing our advisory services and fees is available upon request. References to Simon Quick Advisors as being “registered” does not imply a certain level of education or expertise.

This newsletter and the accompanying discussion include forward-looking statements. All statements that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements, including any statements that relate to future market conditions, results, operations, strategies or other future conditions or developments and any statements regarding objectives, opportunities, positioning or prospects. Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon speculation, expectations, estimates and assumptions that are inherently unreliable and subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies. Forward-looking statements are not a promise or guaranty about future events.

Economic, index, and performance information herein has been obtained from various third party sources. While we believe the source to be accurate and reliable, Simon Quick has not independently verified the accuracy of information. In addition, Simon Quick makes no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy, reliability, or utility of information obtained from third parties.

Historical performance results for investment indices and/or categories have been provided for general comparison purposes only, and generally do not reflect the deduction of transaction and/or custodial charges, the deduction of an investment management fee, nor the impact of taxes, the incurrence of which would have the effect of decreasing historical performance results. It should not be assumed that your account holdings correspond directly to any comparative indices or benchmark index, as comparative indices or benchmark index may be more or less volatile than your account holdings. You cannot invest directly in an index.

Indices included in this report are for purposes of comparing your returns to the returns on a broad-based index of securities most comparable to the types of securities held in your account(s). Although your account(s) invest in securities that are generally similar in type to the related indices, the particular issuers, industry segments, geographic regions, and weighting of investments in your account do not necessarily track the index. The indices assume reinvestment of dividends and do not reflect deduction of any fees or expenses. 

Please note: Indices are frequently updated and the returns on any given day may differ from those presented in this document. Index data and other information contained herein is supplied from various sources and is believed to be accurate but Simon Quick has not independently verified the accuracy of this information.